Questions

No. Nothing in the twelve lessons asks you to write, read or run code. Antigravity is a development platform, but the parts a product manager uses are file management and conversation. If you can find a folder on your computer, you can do the whole course.

No. This site is independent and has no connection to Google LLC. Antigravity is Google's product and its trademarks belong to Google; we refer to them only to identify what we are writing about. We host no software, mirror no installer and distribute nothing. Antigravity is downloaded from Google, at antigravity.google, and from nowhere else.

The course is free and there is nothing to buy. There is no sign-up, no email capture, no account, no newsletter and no upsell. Antigravity itself was free during its public preview when we last checked, on 7 September 2026, with rate limits on the models behind it; confirm the current position with Google before you rely on it.

No. The site sets no cookies, runs no analytics, loads no advertising or tag-management scripts, and makes no request to any third party — the fonts are served from this domain rather than from a font network. The only thing stored on your device is your light-or-dark theme choice, kept in your browser's local storage, which never leaves your device and is not a cookie. That is why there is no consent banner: there is nothing to consent to.

The reading is about two hours across twelve lessons. The exercises are the rest, and they are where the value is — budget roughly seven hours in total if you actually do them in your own workspace. You can stop after Module 1 and still have most of the daily benefit.

Partly. The habits — grounding work in files, reading the plan before the work, spot-checking quotes, giving the agent permission to find nothing — will outlast several interface revisions. Specific menu positions and button labels will not; the preview moves quickly. Where a lesson leans on the exact position of a control, it says so and tells you what to search for instead. Every factual claim about the product carries the date we checked it.

For your own context files, yes, and it is the point. For customer personal data, unredacted contracts, credentials or anything under NDA, no. Whatever sits in the folder gets sent to a model when the agent reads it. The fictional TaskFlow material exists so that you can practise without making that decision under time pressure.

Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash are the defaults; Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6 and an open-weights GPT-OSS-120B were also selectable when we checked on 7 September 2026. For the work in this course the difference shows up mainly on long reasoning tasks — strategy critique and multi-file analysis — and barely at all on drafting. Try two on the same prompt rather than taking anyone's word for it.

Three things: context lives in a folder instead of in your head, output lands as files next to the material it came from, and long tasks produce a plan you can reject before any work happens. If none of those three is your bottleneck, the honest answer is that the gain is small and you should not reorganise your week around it.

Email [email protected] with the page and what is wrong. Corrections are the only feedback this site needs, and we would rather hear about an out-of-date screenshot than not.